On April 5th a New Jersey state court jury found Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its talc supplier, Imerys Talc America, liable for claims that a man developed mesothelioma after using defendants’ talcum powder products over several decades. The $37 million compensatory damage award was followed on Wednesday, April 11th with an $80 million punitive damage award after finding that defendants acted with reckless indifference in selling talcum powder products containing asbestos. Plaintiffs asserted during the trial that defendants knew the products contained asbestos, but hid the fact from consumers and regulators by using tests it knew would not detect the contaminant.
On the first full day of deliberations, the jury found that defendants’ talcum powder products contained asbestos and that Plaintiff Stephen Lanzo was exposed to asbestos from using Johnson’s Baby Powder and/or Shower to Shower products. The jury determined that defendants’ products lacked adequate warnings and the product was defectively designed.
The verdict is the first against J&J related to claims that its products contain asbestos and can cause mesothelioma. Over the past two years J&J has also faced multiple plaintiffs’ verdicts linking its talcum powder products to ovarian cancer. Currently there are more than 5,000 lawsuits by women who claim they developed ovarian cancer from using J&J talc products. This recent decision linking J&J talcum powder products to asbestos and mesothelioma not only lends support to the pending ovarian cancer claims, but also opens up an embattled J&J to attacks on a new front.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the date of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.