Status Update On Pending Exactech Multidistrict Litigation (MDL)


Justice is moving swiftly for people injured by defective Exactech hip and knee products. On June 14, 2022, a group of plaintiffs filed a motion with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to consolidate all Exactech joint replacement lawsuits in either the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, or the Southern District of New York.

On October 7, 2022, the JPML found that the “centralization of these actions in the Eastern District of New York will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.” Therefore, all cases in federal court will now be transferred to U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis, who will preside over the litigation. Judge Garaufis will likely schedule an organizational hearing within the coming weeks to discuss how this litigation will proceed.

It is essential to understand that multidistrict litigation is not a class-action lawsuit. These cases will remain individual cases; however, they are coordinated together for pretrial discovery and overall case management.

Our law firm is in the process of filing a number of lawsuits against Exactech for hip and knee implant failures, and we would be happy to review your case if you believe you have a failed Exactech hip or knee implant. We will review your case free of charge, and if we accept it, we work for a percentage of the recovery. We do not charge upfront fees. Josh Kincannon has litigated hip and knee cases for over two decades and has recovered millions of dollars on behalf of victims of defective medical devices.

If you or someone you know has experienced problems arising from an Exactech implant, contact Josh Kincannon at 732.855.6141 or email him at

Relevant Link: JPML Order

Tags: Implant LitigationMedical Device Lawsuit


The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up