New Jersey Statutes annotated on Westlaw in this blog post are used here with permission from Thomson Reuters.
For residential developers operating in New Jersey, transition litigation can be a bane of the developer’s operation. A cottage industry of attorneys, engineers and architects seeks out condominium and homeowner associations in transition and lures them to invest in finding design or construction deviations with the prospect of a big pay day. They file canned complaints asserting a laundry list of claims that often include a claim for double damages and attorney’s fees under the New Jersey Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act (“PREDFDA”). There is, however, a question whether PREDFDA even applies to transition litigation brought by an Association.
Under PREDFDA, a developer that makes a false representation or omits a material fact from its registration or public offering statement “shall be liable to the purchaser for double damages suffered, and court costs expended, including reasonable attorney’s fees ….” A “purchaser” is “any person or persons who acquires a legal or equitable interest in a unit, lot, or parcel ….” Thus, a plain reading of PREDFDA suggests that a condominium or homeowner association that does not acquire a legal or equitable interest in a unit, lot or parcel is not a “purchaser” with standing to assert a claim for double damages and attorney’s fees under PREDFDA.
While we have been largely successful on behalf of our developer clients in obtaining dismissals of PREDFDA claims for double damages, a few courts have declined to follow the plain language of the legislature.
Three different Judges in Hudson County, and a Judge in Somerset County, have followed the plain language of the statute and held that only a “purchaser,” not an Association, has standing to assert a claim under PREDFDA’s enhanced damage provision. Conversely, the Appellate Division, in an unpublished, non-precedential decision, and one Essex County Judge have held that because an Association “stands in the shoes” of purchasers with respect to the common elements, it has standing to assert a PREDFDA claim relating to those common elements.
Until an appellate court issues a published decision addressing the issue, Developers should be diligent in challenging what appears to be a misuse of a statute intended to protect unwitting consumers, not Associations looking for a cash grab.
If you have questions about New Jersey PREDFDA? Contact Don Taylor at 732.855.6434 or Dan Kluska at 732.855.6033.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.