Employer's Legal Resource Blog

Beware of Individual Liability Under the Family and Medical Leave Act

6.5.2017

It is much easier to establish individual liability under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) than under New Jersey state and federal anti-discrimination laws.  That is to say that supervisors, human resources managers and others can potentially be held liable for their actions if an employee files an FMLA claim.

The FMLA’s definition of an employer broadly includes “any person who acts, directly or indirectly, in the interest of an employer to any of the employees of such employer.”  According to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which governs New Jersey law, the FMLA plainly contemplates that liability may be imposed upon an individual person fitting this far-reaching definition.  The court points to the regulations that govern the FMLA which state that “individuals such as corporate officers acting in the interest of an employer are individually liable for any violations of the requirements of the FMLA.”  As a result, a New Jersey court may find an individual subject to FMLA liability when he or she, acting in the employer’s interest, exercises supervisory authority over the complaining employee and is responsible in whole or part for the alleged FMLA violation.

The Third Circuit has defined some of the criteria for ascertaining whether supervisory authority exists.  These include whether the individual: 1) had the power to hire and fire the employee; 2) supervised and controlled the employee’s work schedules or conditions of employment; 3) determined the rate and method of payment of the employee; and 4) maintained employment records.  However, no one of the four factors alone is definitive.  New Jersey courts look at the totality of the circumstances in determining whether supervisory authority exists.   

For example, if a supervisor or human resources representative exercises substantial authority over terminating an employee, even if that person lacks final authority to dismiss the individual, he or she may be individually liable.  To escape such liability, it is not enough that a higher level employee has a veto vote over the termination of said employee; if the supervisor or human resources person advocates for the termination, he or she may be individually liable for violations of the FMLA.  In addition, a supervisor or human resources manager does not have to engage in continuous monitoring of an individual’s job performance for him or her to be held to control the employee’s work environment.  Involvement in preparing annual performance reviews and/or disciplining an individual may be enough to be considered supervisory authority. 

As a potential supervisor, make sure that you follow the requirements of the FMLA to avoid individual liability.  At a minimum, that includes making sure you provide FMLA leave when appropriate and ensuring employees are not penalized for taking FMLA leave time. 

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

PRIVACY POLICY