It's Throwback Thursday where recent headlines remind us to revisit past posts. In this case, The Fair Credit Reporting Act is Not Just About Credit Reports blog post (published in 2016) that covered the rules and guidelines of employers utilizing information in consumer credit reports, particularly financial background information on employment candidates.
Earlier this month, 7-Eleven, Inc. agreed to pay almost $2 million to resolve claims that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act when it conducted background checks on nearly 60,000 prospective employees. The company denies all wrong doing. The assertion is that 7-Eleven violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by not providing the job applicants with a “standalone” notice that a background check would be conducted.
Takeaway: Before running a background check on a prospective employee, employers must ensure that they are complying with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the "Ban the Box" law (another Throwback blog post).
If you are an employer with questions about the Fair Credit Reporting Act, contact Tracy Armstrong or any member of the Wilentz Employment Law Team at 732-352-9858.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.