The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) recently issued guidance regarding the emergency dispensing of Schedule II controlled substances.
First, as per its newly released guidance document, the DEA recognizes that it may not be feasible for a practitioner to deliver, in response to an emergency oral prescription, the follow-up paper prescription to the pharmacy within 7 days as required by 21 CFR 1306.11(d)(4). Therefore, exercising its authority under 21 CFR 1307.03 to grant an exception to the application of any provision in its regulations, the DEA hereby grants practitioners 15 days within which to provide that prescription to the pharmacy.
Next, as per the guidance document, for the duration of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, the DEA allows the practitioner to send the follow-up prescription to the pharmacy via facsimile, or to take a photograph or scan of this follow-up prescription and send the photograph or scan to the pharmacy in place of the paper prescription. It is the responsibility of the practitioner and the pharmacy to ensure that, whichever method the practitioner uses, the prescription contains all of the required information outlined in 21 CFR 1306.05 and 1306.11(d), including the statement that the prescription is “Authorization for Emergency Dispensing.”
Regardless of any exceptions that the DEA has made in response to COVID-19, pharmacists continue to have a corresponding responsibility to ensure that any controlled substance prescription that they fill was issued for a legitimate medical purpose by a practitioner acting in the usual course of his/her professional practice.
A copy of the guidance document is attached here.
If you are a physician or pharmacist with questions regarding the emergency dispensing of Schedule II controlled substances during COVID-19, contact Angelo Cifaldi.
Tags: Coronavirus (COVID-19) • Schedule II Controlled Substances • Healthcare • Healthcare Practitioners
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.