1.3.2017
Employers should be very careful when deducting pay from salaried, exempt employees. Absent a specific statutory exception, exempt employees are entitled to receive their full salary during any week in which they perform work. However, under the Fair Labor Standards Act an employer may deduct pay from an exempt employee under the following specific circumstances:
- For absences from work for one or more full days for personal reasons;
- To offset amounts employees receive as jury or witness fees;
- For penalties resulting from violations of the employer’s safety rules of major significance, so long as they are imposed in good faith;
- For unpaid disciplinary suspensions of one or more full days imposed in good faith for workplace conduct rule infractions; and
- For absences of one or more full days due to sickness or disability if the deduction is made in accordance with a policy.
In addition to these exceptions, employers do not have to pay exempt employees for leave taken under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Employers also do not have to pay exempt employees a full salary during the initial or terminal weeks of employment where an employee does not work for the entire pay period. The employer may, instead, pay the employee a proportionate part of his weekly salary.
What happens when employers make improper deductions? The employer risks losing the ability to classify employees as exempt during the time period in question. In such cases, when making a classification determination, the Department of Labor will consider the following factors:
- The number of times the employer has made improper deductions;
- The length of time the employer has made improper deductions;
- The number and location of the employees who experienced the improper deductions; and
- Whether the employer has a clearly communicated policy permitting or prohibited improper deductions.
Employers should consider the guidelines above when making a deduction from an exempt employee’s pay to ensure compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act and avoid any penalties.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.
