Misclassification Is Costly: How a Single Claim for Unemployment Benefits Cost $7 Million

4.8.2026

When a former worker of PDX North, Inc., a New Jersey trucking company, filed a claim for unemployment, it ended up costing the company $7 million.

A former worker had been classified as an independent contractor. After filing a claim for unemployment benefits, a full review of the company’s employment practices by the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office (“AG”) and Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) was triggered. Following an initial audit identifying misclassification of workers, additional claims and ongoing review by the NJDOL led to the discovery that PDX’s drivers were misclassified across several years resulting in violations of New Jersey’s unemployment compensation and temporary disability benefits laws impacting more than 1,000 workers who were improperly classified as independent contractors instead of employees. The original assessment allegedly exceeded $7.8 million in assessments of unpaid contributions, interests and penalties.

PDX disputed the claims. After a decade from the initial inquiry through settlement and several years of litigation, PDX, the AG’s Office and the NJDOL participated in the resolution of the misclassification claims. In connection with a $7 million settlement, the drivers are now properly classified as employees.

Takeaway: It is critical that workers are properly classified to avoid significant and costly legal claims, assessments and penalties. If you need assistance determining whether your workers are employees or independent contractors, please contact the Employment Law Team at Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.

 

 

Tags: Employee Misclassification Independent Contractors

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up