The Do’s and Do Not’s of Workplace Dress Codes

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Employers have dress code policies in place for many reasons – uniformity, safety and health, to name a few. To be compliant with the law, there are a few boundaries to which workplace dress code policies must adhere: the dress code requirements must not be discriminatory on the basis of any protected class and the dress code must be applied and enforced consistently.

For example, employers cannot maintain and enforce gender-specific dress codes that discriminate based on religious practices, gender identity or expression, or other protected characteristics. Rather, dress code policies must be gender-neutral and not disproportionately impact any protected class.

As it relates to the hospitality industry specifically, any dress code in place for patrons and/or employees must be gender-neutral. Recently, the Division of Civil Rights (DCR) challenged a restaurant policy that included a gender-specific dress code for employees and patrons. The restaurant denied a non-binary patron service because of their sleeveless shirt, which was prohibited for men but not women. Despite the patron advising of their non-binary status, the restaurant required them to adhere to the men’s dress code. The matter resulted in the Attorney General’s Office and the restaurant entering into a consent decree that included both a gender-neutral dress code, training for staff, $5,000 to the complainant patron denied service and an additional $5,000 civil penalty.

Relatedly, while employers may establish grooming policies for employees, they too must be compliant with discrimination laws and the CROWN Act, which explicitly prohibits discrimination based on natural hairstyles associated with race, such as dreadlocks.

Takeaway

If your workplace has a dress code policy, it is important to review it and ensure its compliance with the law as written, as well as how it is implemented and enforced. The Employment Law Team at Wilentz is available to assist with review of policies.

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up