New Jersey is NOT Replacing the ABC Test for Independent Contractor Status

Wednesday, June 24, 2026

On October 1, 2026, New Jersey is adopting detailed regulations explaining how the New Jersey Department of Labor (NJDOL) will interpret and enforce the ABC test. Those regulations will make it harder to classify workers as independent contractors.

The ABC test begins with every worker being presumed to be an employee unless the company proves all three of the following parts.

 A. Freedom From Control: The worker must truly control how the work is done.

 B. Outside the Usual Business: The work must either be outside the company’s normal business, or be performed outside the company’s places of business.

 C. Independent Business: The worker must operate an independently established business that can survive without that one client.

The new regulations do not create a new legal test. Instead, they:

  • define terms more aggressively,
  • add detailed factors NJDOL inspectors will use,
  • reduce reliance on labels/contracts,
  • emphasize “real-world practice” over paperwork, and
  • codify interpretations that many businesses say are stricter than prior practice.  

To classify individuals as independent contractors businesses often rely on:

  • independent contractor agreements,
  • the LLC status of the worker,
  • compensating with a 1099,
  • business insurance purchased by the worker, and
  • professional licenses held by the worker.

These help, but they are not the only factors considered. The new regulations explicitly state that those factors alone are not enough to prove independent contractor status.

Criteria A (Freedom From Control)

The NJDOL will focus on actual working conditions. Regarding Criteria A, a person may have a LLC and sign an independent contractor agreement, but if the company controls schedule, pricing, procedures, and assignments, NJDOL may still classify the person as an employee. Factors that weigh toward employee status include:

  • required schedules,
  • mandatory meetings,
  • performance monitoring,
  • dress codes,
  • restrictions on outside work,
  • discipline systems,
  • required software/apps,
  • pricing set by the company, and
  • mandatory training.  

So even if someone “chooses their hours,” other controls may cause the still fail Criteria A.

Criteria B (Outside the Usual Course of Business)

Criteria B will also become tougher. The rules provide more detailed guidance on:

  • what counts as the company’s “usual business,”
  • what counts as a “place of business,” and
  • and when work is considered integral to the company.  

It will make having independent contractors more difficult for industries where contractors perform the company’s core service, such as:

  • trucking,
  • delivery,
  • salons,
  • home healthcare,
  • construction,
  • staffing models, and
  • financial sales organizations.

For example, a roofing company that hires roofers as 1099s will find it harder to defend the independent contractor status because roofing is the company’s core business.

Criteria C (Independent Business)

The regulations emphasize that the worker must have an independently viable business. The factors include:

  • multiple clients,
  • advertising,
  • separate business location,
  • investment risk,
  • ability to continue after relationship ends, and
  • independently obtained customers.  

An individual working full-time for one company with no outside business activity becomes much harder to classify as a contractor.

What Should Your Business Do Next?

Do not rely on contracts or labels alone. The NJDOL will be focused on how the relationship actually works.

Now is the time to review your independent contractor arrangements, identify higher-risk roles, and address any gaps between your agreements and day-to-day practices.

If you’re unsure where you stand, our Employment Law Team can help assess your current classifications and outline practical options before the new regulations take effect. Call us today to discuss your situation.

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up

Tracy Armstrong Photo

Tracy Armstrong
Chair, Employment Law Team
Shareholder