The CDC Redefines the Definition of “Close Contact“
On October 21, 2020, the CDC updated its definition of “close contact." Close contact now means contact with an individual, within 6 feet, for an aggregate of 15 minutes or more in a 24-hour period. The risk associated with “close contact“ starts from two days before illness onset (or, for asymptomatic patients, two days prior to testing) until the time the individual is isolated. It no longer requires a single continuous 15-minute “contact.”
The CDC also removed the contacts’ use of facemasks as a consideration in the analysis. This decision was made “because the general public has not received training on proper selection and use of respiratory PPE, such as an N95, the determination of a close contact should generally be made irrespective of whether the contact was wearing respiratory PPE. At this time, differential determination of close contact for those using fabric face coverings is not recommended.“
Employers need to be mindful of these new guidelines when contact tracing in the workplace is required.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.