Oftentimes employers navigating leave issues find it difficult to understand and navigate the various requirements of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). This post highlights frequently asked questions by employers concerning FMLA.
- Can FMLA leave apply retroactively?
It depends. If an employer does not properly designate leave as FMLA leave, the employer may retroactively designate the leave if the employer's failure to timely designate the leave does not harm the employee. Additionally, the employer and the employee can agree to retroactively designate the leave.
- When can an employer get a second opinion?
If an employer has a reason to doubt the validity of an medical certification in support of an employee’s request for FMLA leave, an employer may require that the employee obtain a second opinion. The employer may select the doctor that will render the second opinion; however, the physician is not permitted to be employed by the employer on a regular basis. The employer must pay for the second opinion.
- What forms are required for an employee to return to work?
No paperwork is required. Employers may require an employee to provide an anticipated return to work date. Employers may also require employees who take leave for their own serious health condition to obtain a fitness-for-duty certification before returning to work. The fitness-for-duty certification must only be related to the health condition that necessitated the FMLA leave. Employers should note that if they require a fitness-for-duty certification, they are not permitted to seek a second opinion regarding the employee’s ability to return to work, and, must reinstate the employee once a fitness-for-duty certification is submitted.
Takeaway: Navigating FMLA leave issues may be multi-faceted. Employers should review their current policies and practices for compliance.
Have an FLMA-focused question not covered here? Send an email to Ashley Morin.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the date of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.