The Marijuana Haze Continues
New Jersey has amended its medical marijuana law to address employment concerns. Specifically, the amendment prohibits employers from taking adverse action based solely on the fact that a person is a registered medical cannabis patient. Adverse action includes: refusing to hire an applicant; terminating an employee; requiring an employee to retire; and discriminating against an employee in compensation or in any terms, conditions or privileges of employment.
Additionally, the law provides protections for employees and prospective employees who test positive for cannabis. Specifically, the employer must provide the individual with written notice that he/she can provide a legitimate medical explanation for the positive test result or can request a confirmatory retest of the original sample. Within three days after receiving the written notice, the individual can submit information to the employer to explain the positive test result or can request a confirmatory retest of the original sample.
The amendment was passed on the heels of a decision by the New Jersey Appellate Division, which reversed a trial court’s dismissal of an action under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, alleging failure to accommodate out of office use of medical marijuana. The Appellate Division held that while New Jersey’s medical marijuana law specifically indicates that employers need not accommodate medical marijuana users in the workplace; it did not foreclose an action of an employee to allege that when they are suffering from a disability and it would be a reasonable accommodation (under New Jersey Law Against Discrimination) to use medical marijuana after work.
The decision and the recent amendment serve as reminders to employers to exercise caution if an employee is using medical marijuana.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.