High Net Worth Divorce
Stockbrokers, financial planners, hedge fund managers and other high net worth individuals (and their spouse) going through a divorce often face issues arising from the nature of their compensation structures, which may involve commissions, stock options, restricted stock, deferred compensation, WAP accounts, sign on or stay bonuses, forgivable loans, and various other forms of compensation. Hiring a family lawyer that has experience in these types of compensation structures and the financial impact they may have in a divorce, with respect to alimony, child support and equitable distribution, may be a focus for selecting the appropriate lawyer.
Selecting a lawyer with experience representing high net worth individuals may have a significant impact on financial distribution. Often, attorneys without this experience either do not take the time or do not have the necessary experience to fully grasp a high net worth individual’s compensation structure and apply governing law to the benefit of their client. By way of example, it may be useful to identify recurring income versus lump sum forms of compensation that may be considered an aberration and therefore not a factor for consideration in an alimony analysis. Such compensation may include receiving a one-time sign on or retention bonus as compensation that a financial planner received during the marriage. In another hypothetical example, consider a future or unknown sign-on bonus that is expected to be received by the financial planning spouse at some future date beyond the divorce, and whether or not the now former spouse would have any entitlement to it.
If you have a question or wish to discuss this topic with one of our family lawyers, please give Joe a call at (732) 352-9871.
Originally Posted 4/12/2017
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.