Thank you for your interest in Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.’s legal blogs. You will receive an email sent to the address entered in order to confirm your subscription. Please watch for it and click the link to confirm your subscription.
Employers Must Comply with WARN Acts During COVID-19 Pandemic
Many New Jersey employers who are struggling to keep their doors open in light of the downturn in the economy resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have considered reducing their workforce in order to survive. For some of these employers, there is a federal law, the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, and a New Jersey law, the New Jersey Millville Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act (New Jersey Mini-WARN Act) which may require that the employer provide its employees with 60 days notice prior to its first employee termination. Employers subject to these laws are those with:
- 100 or more full-time employees (employees who work over 20 hours per week and have been employed for at least 6 out of the last 12 months), or
- 100 or more employees, including part-time employees, who, in combined total, work at least 4,000 hours per week.
Employers are subject to the federal and state WARN Acts if they engage in an action which results in a “loss of employment” for at least 50 employees. These actions may include plant closings, mass layoffs or drastic cuts to employee work hours. An employer that closes a plant is subject to the WARN Acts when a shutdown of a single site of employment, results in the loss of employment of 50 or more employees during a 30 day period. Under the New Jersey Mini-WARN Act, a plant closing is called a “termination of operations.” Secondly, an employer may be subject to the WARN Acts when it engages in a mass layoff wherein 33% of the workers at a single site of employment have suffered a loss of employment, as long as a minimum of 50 employees are terminated. Employers should note that if 500 employees or more are terminated, the 33% requirement does not apply. Thirdly, a loss of employment under the Acts also occurs if an employer cuts its employees hours so they work less than 50% of the usual amount of hours worked for each month during a 6 month period of time.
Both Acts state that if employees are laid off for less than six months, then the 60 day notice is not required. This is true as long as the employer makes it clear in its layoff notice that the layoff is temporary, and the employer intends to return the employees back to work within six months. The employer must rehire the employees within six months, unless there are unforeseen business circumstances at the time of rehire.
Although there are exceptions to both the federal and state WARN Acts, they are complex. The same exceptions do not apply to both Acts and New Jersey has exceptions which apply to some, but not all, of the three types of employer actions. Moreover, the penalties for violating the WARN Acts are steep, particularly for violations of the New Jersey Mini-Warn Act. The New Jersey Mini-WARN Act provides a severance penalty of one week's pay for each year of completed service for any failure to give a proper notice (offset by any back pay damages paid "because of a violation of" the federal WARN Act).
Takeaway: Determine whether, as an employer, you are subject to the WARN Acts before you take any action.
If you are an employer and need help navigating the WARN Acts during this COVID-19 crisis, or have any other employment law concern, contact Stephanie Gironda or any member of the Wilentz Employment Law Team.
- U.S. Department of Labor: Employer's Guide to the WARN Act
- New Jersey Millville Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act
Tags: Coronavirus (COVID-19) • WARN Act • New Jersey Mini-WARN Act
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.