EEOC Issues Guidance that Employers May Not Require COVID-19 Antibody Tests of its Employees


On Wednesday, June 17, 2020, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued guidance that employers cannot mandate COVID-19 antibody tests before allowing employees back to work.  The EEOC referenced the recent guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), indicating that antibody tests should not be used to determine if someone is immune to the virus, or as a basis for decisions about allowing workers back to the workplace.

“An antibody test constitutes a medical examination under the ADA,“ the EEOC said.  “In light of CDC interim guidelines that antibody test results ‘should not be used to make decisions about returning persons to the workplace,’ an antibody test at this time does not meet the ADA‘s ‘job related and consistent with business necessity’ standard for medical examinations or inquiries for current employees.  Therefore, requiring antibody testing before allowing employees to re-enter the workplace is not allowed under the ADA,“ the EEOC added.

Please note the EEOC indicated that it will “closely monitor” recommendations by the CDC and may adjust this guidance accordingly if the CDC changes its stance.

Employers can take note, however that the EEOC has said that employers may administer viral tests to determine if an individual is actively infected with COVID-19 before permitting a worker back on a job site.

If you are an employer with questions about this legal alert or any other employment law related matter, contact Tracy Armstrong or any member of the Wilentz Employment Law team.


The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Thank you for your interest in Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.’s legal blogs. You will receive an email sent to the address entered in order to confirm your subscription. Please watch for it and click the link to confirm your subscription.