Ongoing Pain After Cartiva is Not Something You Should Ignore

4.1.2026

Patients with Cartiva implants are often told their pain is “normal,” that they are “slow healers,” or that they simply need more time. But if you are months or even years beyond surgery and still experiencing significant symptoms, the possibility of implant failure should be taken seriously.

Symptoms that may suggest a failing Cartiva implant can include:

  • Persistent or worsening big toe joint pain
  • Stiffness or reduced range of motion
  • Swelling around the joint
  • Difficulty walking or pushing off the foot normally
  • A toe that appears shorter, unstable, or deformed
  • Imaging findings suggesting subsidence, loosening, bone loss, or related complications

For some people, the symptoms are severe from the start. For others, they develop more gradually. Either way, patients suffering with any of the above symptoms need to see their healthcare provider.

Why some patients have not had revision surgery yet

There are many reasons a patient may not have undergone revision surgery, even if the Cartiva implant is causing problems.

Sometimes the patient is still in the diagnostic stage and has only recently begun to understand that the implant may be failing. Sometimes the patient has been advised to monitor the situation before making a decision. In other cases, the patient is trying to avoid another major surgery, especially if fusion, bone grafting, or hardware may be required. And in some situations, the patient may simply not yet have been told clearly that revision is likely coming.

That is why a “no revision yet” case should not automatically be dismissed. A person can still be dealing with real injury and real functional loss, and simply not yet undergone revision surgery.  If this is your situation, we want to speak to you.   

What may be happening inside the joint

The Cartiva implant has been associated with problems such as shrinking, migrating, subsiding into the bone, and failing to perform as intended. That kind of failure can contribute to continued pain, progressive bone loss, worsening stiffness, and a more difficult long-term recovery.

This is one reason patients who are still symptomatic should not simply “wait it out” without follow-up. If the implant is failing, continued delay may mean more bone loss, more instability, and potentially a more complex revision later. It’s important to follow up with a healthcare provider and obtain imaging when symptoms continue, because early detection may be important to protecting the joint and understanding the full extent of the damage.

What you should do if you are still suffering

Your health comes first. If you are having serious pain, swelling, redness, warmth, or other troubling symptoms, you should contact your orthopedic surgeon, foot-and-ankle specialist, or another qualified medical provider, and consider imaging such as X-rays or MRI when appropriate.

From a practical standpoint, there are several important steps to take:

1. Get evaluated

A medical provider can assess whether your symptoms may be tied to implant failure, ongoing arthritis, bone loss, instability, or another issue requiring treatment.

2. Preserve your records

Keep copies of operative reports, imaging, follow-up notes, referrals, billing records, and any recommendation for further care. In a Cartiva case, these records can be critical to understanding what happened and where things stand now.  If you don’t have your records, we can help you get them.

3. Document how the injury is affecting your life

Pain while walking, standing, exercising, or working matters. So does loss of mobility, reduced activity, and disruption to your normal routine.

4. Do not assume you need to wait until revision

If you are still symptomatic and your healthcare providers are evaluating the implant, that may already be enough to justify a legal consultation. Waiting until the situation worsens is not always the best approach.  Remember, the consultation is free of charge.

Why timing matters

Another reason not to delay is that legal deadlines may apply even before revision surgery occurs. Every state has a statute of limitations, and the timing can depend on when you realized, or reasonably should have realized, that your implant was causing injury.

In other words, waiting for revision surgery is not always neutral from a legal standpoint. A patient may already be experiencing symptoms, seeking evaluation, and accumulating medical evidence while the filing clock may also be running. That is one reason early legal review can be important, even if the treatment plan is still developing.

Talk to a Cartiva lawyer if you are still suffering

If you received a Cartiva implant and are still dealing with pain, stiffness, swelling, loss of motion, or concern about possible implant failure, do not assume you have to wait until revision surgery happens to ask questions. Your symptoms may already matter medically and legally.

To speak with an attorney about your Cartiva lawsuit options, call 732-313-2323 for a free consultation.

 

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up

Joshua S. Kincannon Photo

Joshua S. Kincannon
Shareholder