Appellate Court Upholds Employee Termination for Facebook Post Stating BLM Is Racist


On May 20, 2022, the New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed an employer’s decision to terminate an employee over her comments on a Facebook post.

McVey v AtlantiCare Medical System

The employee posted that she felt the phrase “Black Lives Matter” is racist, that the Black Lives Matter movement promotes “segregation,” and that Black citizens were “killing themselves.” She later clarified that she “support[ed] all lives . . . as a nurse they all matter and [she] d[id] not discriminate.” The employee’s profile displayed that she was a Corporate Director for AtlantiCare. When AtlantiCare learned of the post, an investigation was conducted, and the employee was terminated. The employee was told that she was being terminated due to her “repeated instances of poor management judgment – a failure to uphold AtlantiCare values.” The employee sued, alleging wrongful discharge.

Employer Social Media Policy

The employer had a written social media policy that stated, “[E]mployee use of social media [a]ctivities, inside or outside of the workplace, has the potential to affect AtlantiCare employee job performance, the performance of others, AtantiCare’s brand and/or reputation and AtlantiCare’s business interests.” The policy also provided that employees were “personally responsible” for the content they posted on social media.

Employee Suit Claims

The employee alleged that her termination was punishment for exercising her First Amendment right under the Constitution and the equivalent entitlement under the New Jersey Constitution. She further alleged that she was wrongfully discharged in violation of a clear mandate of public policy. AtlantiCare filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that there was no state action, so the employee could not have a free speech claim. The trial court agreed with AtlantiCare and dismissed the employee’s complaint.

Decision by the Appellate Division

The Appellate Division upheld the lower’s court decision. The Appellate Division noted that no court in New Jersey had ever “held that a private entity that encroaches upon a private individual’s constitutional rights to free speech has violated a clear mandate of public policy.” The Appellate Division further noted that the majority of courts that have examined this issue in other jurisdictions have also precluded such a claim.

Takeaway: In light of the New Jersey court’s holding on free speech, employers should review social media policies to ensure that employees are aware that social media posts can affect their jobs. Employers with questions about the recent court decision can contact Tracy Armstrong or another member of the Wilentz Employment Law Team.


The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Thank you for your interest in Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.’s legal blogs. You will receive an email sent to the address entered in order to confirm your subscription. Please watch for it and click the link to confirm your subscription.