Congress has amended the tip pooling requirements in the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) to clarify that is illegal for employers to keep tips received by their employees, regardless of whether the employer uses the tip credit or pays their employees the full minimum wage. Additionally, for those employers who opt to pay the full minimum wage (and not use the tip credit), the amendment eliminates the restriction that prohibited employers from distributing money from a tip pool to employees who are not usually tipped (at least until further guidance is developed on this issue).
As such, the FLSA now allows employers to distribute tips via a tip pool to both tipped and non-tipped employees (such as cooks and dishwashers). However, employers are prohibited from paying any portion of the tip pool to owners, managers, or supervisors. The Department of Labor has issued guidance which states that it will use the “duties test” to determine if an employee is a manger or supervisor. Under the duties test, an individual will be considered a manager/supervisor if: his or her “primary duty is management of the enterprise in which the employee is employed;” if she or he “customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees;” and if she or he is someone who “has the authority to hire or fire other employees or whose suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring, firing, advancement, promotion or any other change of status of other employees.”
Employers who violate the FLSA amendment and permit supervisors to participate in tip pools face being assessed civil penalties and liquidated damages.
TAKEAWAY: Restaurant employers should review their tip pooling policies to ensure they are compliant with the recent amendment.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.