The widespread use of electronic communications devices today has employers struggling to regulate acceptable use of such devices in the workplace. Unregulated use may generate problems for employers if employees use devices (intentionally or unintentionally) in a way that violates employment policies (e.g., anti-harassment), or if employees spend excessive amounts of time on these devices so as to impact productivity or otherwise compromise performance. Considering the nuances involved in navigating acceptable use of use smartphones and other devices in the workplace, what solutions are available to employers to regulate use and prevent problems in the work place? The answer is as simple as usage is complex: the Employee Handbook.
Many employer handbooks contain general language such as, the organization “reserves the right to review and access all matters on the organization’s network and services at any time.” However, this (or similar) language is too broad to allow employers to access the numerous types of employer-provided electronic devices. In order to be able to monitor device use by employees, employers must describe each type of media system covered by policy, (e.g., laptops, smart phones, tablets, etc.) that the employer reserves the right to access and review. It is important that employers provide notice to employees that specifies which devices and systems are covered by an organization’s IT policies. If a policy fails to achieve this level of specificity, in a dispute, an employee may claim a reasonable expectation of privacy in an electronic communication relative to a specific device.
Situations arise that require employers to access an employee’s password-protected accounts. For instance, when an employee is alleged to have used those accounts to harass a co-worker, or in an another example, if an employee is out on extended leave and information is contained in that employee’s email account that must be retrieved to meet a deadline. A Policy that does not specifically state that it may monitor an employee’s personal, password protected email account on a company owned device is not specific so as to allow the employer to do so.
The key to adopting an effective electronic communications policy is for employers to provide notice to all employees that details all of the modes of electronic communications the organization monitors. Therefore, employers should identify each type of communication being monitored in the company handbook. For example, the handbook should state that employees’ personal, password protected email account accessed on company owned laptops, personal computers or smart phones is not private and may be monitored and accessed by the company at any time. Otherwise, an employer risks an argument that the employee has a privacy interest in a particular type of communication.
Caveat: An employee’s emails to an attorney in a password protected personal account is excluded from such policies because such communications are protected by the attorney-client privilege.
TAKEAWAY: Employers should be specific in drafting electronic communications policies and should provide notice to all employees.
Have an employment law question? Maybe we can help. Contact Stephanie Gironda at (732) 855-6027.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.