Thank you for your interest in Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.’s legal blogs. You will receive an email sent to the address entered in order to confirm your subscription. Please watch for it and click the link to confirm your subscription.
Employment Applications: Be Careful What You Ask For
Employers should be careful in formulating employment applications that they do not inadvertently provide an applicant with a legal claim. Specifically, the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination makes it unlawful to refuse to hire an individual because of his or her membership in such protected categories as race, national origin, disability, age, marital status, familial status, sexual orientation and gender identity. In addition, the New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act makes it illegal to retaliate against an employee for taking leave pursuant to that law. It is worth noting that along with the don’t-ask questions on employment applications, there is one important do-ask question—whether an employee has a post-employment restriction.
It may be obvious that an employer should not directly ask a potential employee on the application if he or she is a member of a protected category because the potential employee may, even if mistaken, believe that the employer based its hiring decision on the fact that the employee is in a protected group. Keep in mind also that an application should not then indirectly ask for protected category information either. With respect to age discrimination, for example, an application should clearly not ask for the applicant’s date of birth, and furthermore, it should not ask for the individual’s date of high school graduation as an indirect method of determining a person’s age. Likewise, an employer should not ask the religion of an applicant on the application, and should stay away from questions that indirectly provide the same information, such as, “is there any day of the week you can’t work for religious reasons?” Similarly, an employer should not ask on an application whether a person is disabled, and an employer should not indirectly attempt to determine whether there is a disability by asking how many days the individual was absent last year at a prior job.
Apart from making sure that the job application does not ask questions that could be considered discriminatory, there are other potential pitfall questions. For example, one question often seen on job applications is “have you ever filed a workers’ compensation claim?” If an employer does not hire an individual who answers yes to this question, the employee could claim workers’ compensation retaliation. In addition, New Jersey has a “ban the box” statute which makes it illegal to ask on an application whether an individual has been convicted of a crime.
One question employers should consider asking on an application is whether an individual has any post-employment restrictions from a prior job. This question is important to ask for several reasons. Many post-employment restriction agreements contain a clause wherein the employee agrees to tell his or her new employer about the restrictions. If the applicant you are considering does not do so, that may tell you something about his or her honesty. Also, a new employer may be liable for “tortious interference with contract” or similar claims if the employer knows about post-employment restrictions and violates them anyway. Moreover, if the newly hired employee does not tell you about the effective restrictions, you may receive a call from the former employer causing you to have to deal with a messy situation that may include deciding whether to terminate the new employee or continue to violate the post-employment restrictions and gamble with potential legal consequences.
TAKEAWAY: Review your employment application carefully to ensure it does not provide applicants with potential claims.
Tags: Employment Application • Employment Protected Class • Employment Contract • New Jersey Law Against Discrimination • New Jersey Workers’ Compensation Act
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.
Significant Changes to New Jersey’s Unemployment Compensation Law Will Take Effect on July 31, 2023
Employer Alert: Banning Recording in the Workplace Could Infringe on Employee Rights
Is it the End of Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Severance Agreements?