The issue of parole is an area that few consider or plan for after having been sentenced to a prison term. Parole is not guaranteed. Any individual sentenced to a prison term should be considering parole issues, if not a sentencing, then shortly thereafter and planning for that day that he or she is eligible for parole consideration.
Facing the Parole Board can be a daunting task. The parole process is not one that an individual should face without experienced counsel. While the standards for release appear straightforward, the review process is highly subjective. The Parole Act itself seems simple enough:
§ 30:4-123.53. Release of inmate
a. An adult inmate shall be released on parole at the time of parole eligibility, unless information supplied in the report filed pursuant to section 10 of P.L.1979, c. 441 (C. 30:4-123.54) or developed or produced at a hearing held pursuant to section 11 of P.L.1979, c. 441 (C. 30:4-123.55) indicates by a preponderance of the evidence that the inmate has failed to cooperate in his or her own rehabilitation or that there is a reasonable expectation that the inmate will violate conditions of parole imposed pursuant to section 15 of P.L.1979, c. 441 (C. 30:4-123.59) if released on parole at that time. In reaching such determination, the board panel or board shall state on the record the reasons therefor.
For the purposes of this subsection, "failed to cooperate in his or her own rehabilitation" shall include, in the case of an inmate who suffers from mental illness as defined in section 2 of P.L.1987, c. 116 (C. 30:4-27.2) that does not require institutionalization, that the inmate failed to fully participate in or cooperate with all prescribed treatment offered during incarceration.
b. A juvenile inmate shall be released on parole when it shall appear that the juvenile, if released, will not cause injury to persons or substantial injury to property.
While seemingly straightforward, the decision making is highly subjective, frequently based upon a record controlled by the Parole Board, and frequently based upon information the Parole Board designates as “confidential.” Such information may be collected and relied upon by the Parole Board, but will not be disclosed to the individual.
It is vital that a Parole Plan is uniquely tailored to the needs of the individual. A plan which will satisfy the Parole Board that release is appropriate, that the individual will not commit another offense and will comply with all conditions imposed as a condition of parole
Additionally, the Parole Board’s discretion is broad and will not be reversed unless the Appellate Division determines that the Board has acted arbitrarily – a difficult – but not impossible standard for an individual to meet. New Jersey State Parole Board v. Cestari, 224 N.J.Super. 534, 543-544 (App. Div. 1988), certif. denied 111 N.J. 649 (1988); Bailiff v. New Jersey State Parole Bd., No. A-3127-11T2, 2014 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 95 (App. Div. Jan. 16, 2014) ; Melvins v. New Jersey State Parole Bd., No. A-1761-08, 2010 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1948 (App. Div. Aug. 12, 2010); Klingebiel v. New Jersey State Parole Board, No. A-5341-04, 2008 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 3018 (N.J. App. Div. Aug. 11, 2008); K.P v. New Jersey State Parole Board, No. A-1470-01, 2002 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1 (N.J. App. Div. Apr. 26, 2002).
Any individual who is incarcerated and will be facing the Parole Board should be considering establishing a solid and proper Parole Plan at the earliest possible time. Creating a compelling parole plan that is unique to the needs of the individual, that addresses the concerns of the Parole Board, that takes into consideration the law, and is prepared to anticipate “confidential” information that may be used to deny parole is critical to obtaining parole upon first eligibility. Waiting until parole has been denied is a recipe for failure and the unfortunate continued denial of one’s liberty.
The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services. Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the date of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness. The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.
This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability. Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.
If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.